riverplace1stteetohills.jpg

Texas is the 7th fastest growing state, thanks to no state income tax and still reasonable real estate prices.  Austin is growing as fast as the rest of the state, thanks to attractive golf communities like River Place.

 


    It used to be that water and climate were the strongest attractions for retirees and others seeking a better life.  But the latest U.S. Census Bureau report indicates that residents of California and Florida are paddling out of state at the same rate as those moving in. (We commented initially on the report here a couple of days ago; scroll down for the article.)
    The states immediately to the east of California are gaining new residents at a faster rate than is the Golden State.  Indeed, Nevada, Utah, Arizona and Idaho grew the fastest of the 50 states from July '06 to July '07.  However, Nevada's and Arizona's growth rates were considerably less than in the prior year, reflecting the housing inventory issues in overbuilt Las Vegas and Phoenix, respectively.  At .8%, California was the only state west of Kansas that grew at less than the overall national growth rate of 1%, and most of that increase was due to births.
    Where is everyone going?  Besides the aforementioned Mountain States, only Texas, North Carolina and Georgia grew at rates above 2% in the year-to-year time period.  Wyoming and Colorado grew at an even 2.0%.  Only Virginia, Mississippi and Alabama among the southeastern states grew at less than 1% (I don't count Maryland or Delaware in the southeastern group, but Delaware actually grew at 1.4%, Maryland at a mere .3%).
    South Carolina, where I own a second home, grew at a healthy 1.8%, and although we haven't seen a city-by-city or county breakdown of the numbers for the state, we have noted that construction continues in the Myrtle Beach area even as some residential builders declare troubles.  In March, for example, the first occupants will move into homes around Market Commons, a large retail/office/residential complex on the site of a former U.S. Air Force Base less than two miles from Myrtle Beach's commercial airport.  Two-dozen golf courses are within a 20-minute drive, and golf course closings, which had reached epic proportions in the last few years, seemed to have slowed to zero for the time being.  An example of New Urbanism, Market Commons provides its residents the opportunity to work, shop and be entertained substantially where they live, without starting their cars.  Somewhere, Al Gore is smiling.
    Michigan and Rhode Island also demonstrated that abundant water is not enough to overcome faltering economies.  The two states were the only ones to lose population in the last year, although tiny Rhode Island lost just a net 3,800 citizens.  For those contemplating owning homes both north and south, Rhode Island is not a bad choice for the northern complement.  Providence, with its excellent colleges and surprisingly busy airport, is an interesting town with good restaurants and cultural attractions, and the excellent golf throughout the state ranges from public (like the funky Donald Ross-designed Triggs Memorial in Providence) to the ultra-private Newport Country Club, site of the LPGA Open year before last.  Carnegie Abbey, a high-end residential complex with a lush private golf course, may appeal to the hedge fund manager in you, with price points that begin just short of seven figures.  
    Florida's growth rate slowed to 1.1%; a whopping 135,000 fewer residents migrated to the state than did the year before.  If unoccupied condominiums were counted as people, Florida might have given Louisiana (+1.2%) some competition, but almost as many folks are moving north on I-95 as are going south.  Those who plan to relocate to the Sunshine State in a few years had best keep an eye on the property tax structure in the no-income-tax state as well as further escalations in insurance rates.  And for those who like to get out and about, check traffic reports every once in a while.  The state's roads are a mess.

 

northhampton2ndhole.jpg  
Jacksonville doesn't seem like much of the rest of Florida.  It features reasonable real estate prices and manageable traffic.  The golf was good too, including the surprisingly testing Palmer layout at North Hampton.

    We scour the real estate message boards, and one constant theme among real estate agents is that the media has fanned the flames of the housing crisis, scaring away precious customers.  Au contraire.  If anything, the media has been too easy, primarily because they are too lazy to do their homework. 

    Maybe most of us slack off a little at holiday time, but the mainstream media laziness in reporting on the real estate mess in the U.S. knows no season.  Their speed dial always seems set to the chief economist at the National Association of Realtors.  Asking the National Association of Realtors about the real estate market is like asking McDonalds about obesity.  You are never going to get a straight (read "honest") answer.

Asking the NAR about the real estate market is like asking McDonald's about obesity.

The NAR treats its members like mushrooms, keeping them in the dark, ironically, by pumping a constant spurt of sunshine their way in spite of all evidence that there is nothing to be optimistic about in the coming year.  And yet whenever the Wall Street Journal or other "trusted" sources produce a market update, you can count on them turning to some economist at the NAR.
    The Christmas Day present in my email inbox was yet another piece of lazy journalism, this time by Wall Street Journal Online and Marketwatch reporter Amy Hoak.  I offer Ms. Hoak's opening sentences unexpurgated:  "After a year of falling house prices in numerous parts of the country and a meltdown in the mortgage market that affected borrowers regardless of their ZIP code, many hope that housing markets will finally start to get better next year...But if there's any improvement in 2008, it may be relatively modest."
    How's that for investigative journalism?  State the blindingly obvious (prices are falling, the mortgage infrastructure is a mess), the cloyingly banal (many hope the market will get better) and then wrap it all up with the startling conclusion that gains in 2008 "may be relatively modest."  Small wonder she gets some of her insights from the NAR's Chief Economist, Lawrence Yun.  We thought we were past all this when David Lareah, the NAR's former chief economist and the market's foremost Polyanna, retired to Florida where he is no doubt sitting around the pool telling his fellow 60-somethings that there is no condo problem in Miami.  
    But Yun and his cronies at the NAR have clearly embraced the Lareah legacy, although without the strictly glass-always-full optimism.  Their approach is more three-quarters full, one-quarter empty.  "The National Association of Realtors predicts a slight increase in existing-home sales next year, but a decline in new-home sales," Ms. Hoak writes.  In the face of escalating foreclosures, tightening of credit, huge unsold inventories of homes, new home starts that have ground to a halt, ugly government data, and most sane economists' predictions of gloom well into 2009, the boys at the NAR still cannot admit the glass is empty.  Not content to leave it at that, Yun tells Ms. Hoak that a low interest rate on mortgages "should have provided a lift to home sales, but it has not."  
    In other words, he wasn't wrong.  Those of us who didn't buy over-priced houses were. 

    No wonder there's a blogosphere.