My brother Bob, a financial manager and strategist, has identified eerie similarities between the swirling steroids controversy and the state of the U.S. economy.  After reading a note he sent me the other day (see below), I recalled the story of Lyle Alzado, former Oakland Raiders football great.  Alzado met a horrible demise in 1992 after years of rampant steroids use, which he chronicled in Sports Illustrated a few months before

Paulson, Bernanke, Clemens, Bonds...it's all the same thing.

his death.  "It wasn't worth it," he wrote of his decades long use of performance enhancers. "If you're on steroids or human growth hormone, stop.  I should have."
    Paulson, Bernanke and the other managers of the U.S. economy might also heed Alzado's advice.  With only the lightest of editing, I outline Bob's thoughts below:

    The human body has natural limits, natural ups and downs. The use of steroids is always going to lead to blowback because it interferes with the body's natural rhythms in a fundamentally unhealthy way.  Steroids aren't about improving nutrition or enhancing the immune system; they're about goosing performance.
    The economy too displays natural cycles and rhythms, the dominant one being the business cycle.  But about 15 years back, Alan Greenspan and the financial leaders of our country started messing seriously with the natural cycles of the economy in a bid to alleviate us of any economic pain -- i.e. recession -- in much the same way steroids are supposed to alleviate physical pain, speed "recovery" after workout, improve peak performance...even the vocabulary is similar.
    Cue the Moral Hazard, the Federal Reserve's message to take all the risk we want because, if the shit hits
Bonds hit the wall, just as the economy is doing after one-too-many goosings.

the fan, the Fed will spread the risks and bail us out.  Those of us who are more responsible are effectively taxed to help pay for everyone else's foolishness.
    Cue also the dot-com bubble, cue the breakneck lowering of rates 2000-2002 -- a bone-headed decision which led to the real estate bubble and bust -- and cue the sub-prime debacle leading to another round of interest rate cuts and phony bailouts which will just deepen and prolong the pain.  Barry Bonds was not faking when he complained about how hard it was to get out of bed in the morning in the last few years.  And his home run production plummeted after a certain point.  He hit the wall, just as the economy is doing after one-too-many goosings and a natural "aging" of the expansion.  We should not feel too sorry for Barry, but the long-term effects of steroid usage can be pretty nasty.  
    Henry Paulson, Ben Bernanke, Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds...it's all the same thing; manipulation and denial with the aim of the enrichment of the powerful (individuals and institutions) and screw the rest of us.  And the SEC has simply looked on until it's too late, as has professional baseball.
    Clearly the man in the street is responsible for taking on all the debt that was pushed like a drug.  But the economic "leadership", unaccompanied by any sense of a moral compass, has played a major role in putting us here.

    Selling a home is not a lot of fun, but I intend to make a serious game of it when it comes time to list our primary home in Connecticut a few years from now.  I have decided to play the real estate version of The Price Is Right, the legendary game show in which contestants guess an item's value. 
    I will select my three "contestants" by virtue of their local reputations, counting substantially on the
We raised our kids here.  I don't want an agent taking advantage of our emotions.

recommendations of friends.  Then, I will ask the three to submit the price they believe our house will fetch.  I will cross-examine them about the "comparable" houses in the area they used to come up with their appraisals, just to make sure that our modern and expensively re-done kitchen, for example, is not compared against one with 15 year-old formica.  On the other hand, our master bathroom is way undersized and not particularly modern; any agent who looks us in the eyes and says "Big problem" will stay in the running.
    In the end, though, skepticism will save us and greed will win the day and our business.  We will look at the high estimate as being unrealistic and a way to massage our egos.  We've raised our two children in the house and have spent a lot of money and sweat making it comfortable.  Real estate agents have radar for that.  I don't want to take the chance that an unnaturally high estimate appeals to that side of us.  This is, after all, business, and emotion has little place in business. 
    On the other hand, we will look on the lowest estimate of the three as denying us the few extra dollars we are due (or as a strategy to sell our house for a quick commission).  Hey, this is where we raised our kids and spent a lot of sweat equity.  How dare they lowball us!
    Ultimately, the right price will be the one in the middle, not too hot and not too cold.  Like the legendary Price Is Right host, Bob Barker, I will then smile and bestow a nice prize upon the winner.