I was asked the other day if it made more sense to be one of the first to buy in a new community or to wait for things to take hold.  In my answer, I deferred to the buyer's personality:  If you have a pioneering spirit, some tolerance for risk and want the lowest possible price, by all means be the first one on the block.  But, on the other hand, if a good chunk of your net worth is going into the new home and you want to make sure that amenities promised are amenities delivered, then consider waiting for Phase 2 or beyond.
    My wife and I discussed this issue during a nice long walk with the dog this morning.  She reminded me that 19 years ago, we faced this very same dilemma during a visit to Lockwood Folly, a community with a nice golf course about 35 miles north of Myrtle Beach.  Connie was pregnant with our first child at the time so we were all pumped up with planning for
If you have a pioneering spirit, some tolerance for risk and want the lowest possible price, by all means be the first one on the block.

the future (and maybe pumped with a few hormones as well).  But we were also intimidated with the financial responsibilities we were facing in the near term.
    At first, the long term won out.  Lockwood Folly had a sleek golf course I had enjoyed playing, a spanking new clubhouse overlooking the marsh, a few model homes to show, and prices that seemed the most reasonable on the Grand Strand.  (We had done our homework.)  The salesman was enthusiastic in a non-pushy way, and as we toured what would eventually become a community, we were impressed with the combination of live oaks and marshland and the promise of a beautifully landscaped Low Country home.  It seemed like a great investment.  We left a deposit on a lot.
    We backed out, without penalty, two weeks later, really just a simple case of cold feet.  We rationalized the decision on the basis that we weren't going to build for at least a decade; in a new community, we'd basically be holding a non-appreciating asset and paying taxes to boot.  We also reasoned that Lockwood Folly would be forever at the far north end of the Grand Strand and, therefore, more remote than two kids from suburbia could tolerate.  Connie is a beach lover and the community was a good 20 minutes from the nearest sand.  But to be honest, we were simply nervous about being one of the first to commit to the community.  
    Eleven years after that decision, after several vacation stays in the Pawleys Island area, which is well over an hour south of Lockwood, we bought a new condo in Pawleys Plantation.  At the time, the community was about 90% built out and regarded as one of the best and most stable in the area.  We opted for what we knew, not the unknown.
    Over the last 19 years, we have wondered how Lockwood Folly turned out.  I had liked playing the golf course, but it is rarely mentioned in the top rank of the Myrtle Beach area's 120 courses.  A few years ago we were driving up Highway 17 in North Carolina and wound up outside the entrance to the community.  We drove in and were pretty bummed out by what we saw.   Houses were sited close together in most of the neighborhoods, many yards seemed a bit overgrown, landscaping in the common areas seemed indifferent and the entire effect was of a community that maybe hadn't been planned all that well.  
    We looked at each other in relief and congratulated ourselves on backing out of the deal those 19 years ago.  We acknowledged, though, that the decision was more dumb luck than good sense.  There are dozens of communities my wife and I visited early in our marriage that we would be the richer for having been first in - and I mean "richer" both literally and figuratively.  Kiawah Island near Charleston, SC, comes to mind as having real estate that has appreciated maybe 10 times in 20 years.
    But we are still happy with our decision to buy in Pawleys Plantation, mindful that luck plays a big part in making the correct purchase decision (or not making it).  With apologies to the oft-quoted Yogi Berra ("It ain't over 'til it's over"), the moral of this story is that, sure, you can always make a better choice, but you can always make a worse one as well.  

    In 1990, a time when the Japanese yen was quite strong compared with the U.S. dollar, Japanese businessmen began buying up iconic U.S. properties such as Rockefeller Center and, yikes, Pebble Beach Golf Links.  If it weren't for a Japanese banking crisis and economy that plummeted later in the ‘90s, sushi and sake could be on the menu today at the 19th hole at Pebble (not that we don't love both).
    Here we are in 2007 with a banking crisis of our own and a dollar that is in the dumper.  As the famed student of malapropism, Yogi Berra, once said, "it is déjà vu all over again"...only worse.  The dollar is in free fall, oil prices are going in the opposite direction, the housing market is a total mess and foreign investors, more and more, are holders of U.S. debt.  Even the Canadian and U.S. dollars are now at parity.  How woulda thunk it?
    This may be great news for the U.S. trade deficit, but American chauvinists will start to rebel at

It is only a matter of time before cheap currency goes in search of  high-end golfing properties in the States.

the thought of foreigners owning the family jewels (I recall all the op eds when Rockefeller Center was sold in 1990 to Japanese investors.)  The Euro is worth about $1.45 and the pound more than $2.10, and as they gain even more strength against the dollar, European buying power is beginning to assert itself in such varied venues as eBay online auctions and Sotheby's and Christies live art auctions.  It is only a matter of time before cheap currency goes in search of  high-end golfing properties in the States.
    The Euros won't have to look too hard for courses to acquire.  At any one time in the States, up to 200 courses are on the market, according to Kathy Bissell, vice president of National Golf Course Sales for real estate firm Coldwell Banker.  The courses range from little nine-hole mom and pop operations in rural Mississippi listed for less than $500,000 to entire golf course developments.
    "We have a Nevada property available right now for $20 million," Ms. Bissell told me the other day during a phone interview.  The Nevada resort property includes two courses; for something less than 10 million pounds sterling, two courses in the mountains of Nevada could look pretty cheap to a British investor.    
    Ms. Bissell says an increasing number of calls have been coming to her office from places like South Africa, Great Britain and other countries.  South Korean investors are always interested in U.S. properties, including golf courses she says, because the Korean government puts a cap on how much land investment a citizen can make in-country; that is understandable since South Korea is a relatively small country.  Great Britain, not an overwhelmingly large country itself, has few golf course developments in process, and investors there - as well as individuals - could see the current exchange rate as an opportunity to invest in U.S. properties...perhaps even some of our most elite courses.
    Ms. Bissell, pointing to the sale of Pebble Beach just 17 years ago, believes any course could be available if the price were right.
    "I suppose there is a price at which the members of Augusta National or Shinnecock could be persuaded to sell," she says.
    The American chauvinist golfer in me rebels at the thought.  Members of the most exclusive clubs do not need the money.  But logic also reminds us that many of those same members are businessmen, and if they can turn, oh, a couple hundred million dollar profit on a $100,000 investment, who knows?

 

augusta1.jpg

Is there no price at which, say, Augusta National could be sold?

Photo from YourGolfTravel.com