Consider you are out playing a round of golf.  You dead-shank every other shot on the first eight holes and triple bogey every one of them.  Then, from the fairway on the par 5 ninth, you shank yet another approach shot into the woods.  The ball hits a tree and bounces onto the green and into the hole for a birdie.  Would you say you had corrected your swing or were just lucky?  If you were Lawrence Yun, you'd say that hitting the tree and bouncing into the hole was a sign that your swing was just fine and more birdies lay ahead.  
    For those unfamiliar with Mr. Yun, he is the chief economist for the National Association of Realtors, which essentially means he has a real estate
Even when he is negative, Yun cannot help being irrationally positive.

license to kill logic and sell snake oil optimism to any real estate agents or homeowners naïve enough to trust him.  His predictions are dangerous for anyone planning their real estate business or house purchase plans around them.  He was clearly mentored by his predecessor, David Lareah, now retired to Florida where, we can only pray, no one in his community is seeking his advice about the housing market.  He too was a shameless huckster.
    The most recent irrational exuberance by the NAR was a response to the February report on home sales, released Monday.  "...the improvement [in sales] is another sign that the market is stabilizing," said the unsinkable Mr. Yun, who for balance added the limp caveat that existing home sales won't show a "notable" gain until the second half of this year.  Even when he is negative, he cannot help being irrationally positive.
     Is he kidding?  In February, existing home sales rose for just the first time since last July.  Compared with the same month a year ago, February sales were down nearly 24%.  And median home prices dropped by more than 8%.  A ton of new condos are coming on the market in cities like the already suffering Miami and Las Vegas and lenders are acquiring more new foreclosure properties faster than they can sell the ones they already have.  Mortgage lenders are tightening their criteria for loans, and corporations are starting to slow down their transfers of existing employees and their hiring of new ones.  In the face of all this, by what logic does anyone, let alone an economist, see a "notable" turnaround just four or five months from now?
    When I used to watch my kids play peewee soccer, I marveled at how their coaches could keep encouraging the kids on the team no matter how many times they kicked at thin air or ran toward the wrong end of the field.  Mr. Yun, I suppose, would make a good little kids soccer coach.  He has no business coaching anyone about economics.  It would be nice if the Wall Street Journal and other respected media outlets would finally understand that and stop using him as a source.

    The latest vacancy rate data from the U.S. Census Bureau are ugly.  Nationwide, the rate rose to 2.8% in the fourth quarter of 2007, up from 2.7% in the third quarter.  In formerly hot markets, the numbers are considerably worse.  In Orlando, for example, 7.4% of all homes are unoccupied, the highest such rate in the nation.  Miami/Ft. Lauderdale (4.4%), Las Vegas (4.9%), and Phoenix (3.7%) are bad too.
    The story of how these markets got to this point is well documented.

Insist on a contingency with the developer that covers you in the event a certain percentage of the community's homes are rented.

With lots of funny money pouring into these hot markets, developers rushed to build condos and planned communities, speculators and others moved in to buy the units (with zero or a few percentage-point deposits), additional demand evaporated, inventories rose to glut levels, and prices consequently dropped.  Since the speculators had very little skin in the game, they bailed, leaving banks and developers holding the empty bags, and depressing prices.  Increasing foreclosures added accelerant to the problem.
    Many of the vacant units have been rented which, on the face of it, would
These are desperate times, and these are desperate developers.

seem a good thing.  But developers are so desperate for a little cash flow that they are renting homes in their fledgling communities at such bargain-basement prices that they are attracting people with no investment in the local neighborhood.  In markets like Orlando, vacant actually may be a better alternative than rented.  
    "[Our] neighborhood was going downhill as people had been buying the homes and renting them out to some real [expletive deleted]," said one former Orlando resident on a real estate discussion board, congratulating himself on selling his home in 2005.  He complained about "people who do auto repairs in the street in front of their house and then throw used motor oil in the grass in their front yard..."
    That is certainly an extreme case, but hints at an unintended consequence of filling vacant homes with renters.  If you are contemplating the purchase of a home in a new community in one of the areas hit by high vacancy rates, the advice here is to proceed with caution.  You might insist on a contingency with the developer that covers you in the event a certain percentage of the community's homes are rented.  That may have seemed farfetched just a few years ago, but these are desperate times, and these are desperate developers.

    The Wall Street Journal has a recap of the national vacancy rate crisis, including an interactive map that shows rates in selected metro areas.  Click here to see the article.