A dust up between a builder and condo owner near our home in Greater Hartford, CT, reminds us that few things in real estate should be taken for granted.
    According to the Hartford Courant's Consumer Watchdog column, Mike Tedford bought an upscale condo in West Hartford from Konover Properties, a major local developer, which was advertised at 1,639 square feet.   But when Tedford actually took the measure of the place, he found he only had 1,545 square feet.  He was short 100 feet, or the equivalent of a small room.

The builder had measured square footage from the exterior in...

Konover's explanation?  They had measured from the exterior in, including the walls and insulation.    

    Tedford claims he overpaid for his unit by about $20,000 since he was calculating a price based on $255 per square foot.  Konover, for its part, thinks Tedford is trying to wangle an unfair rebate from them.
    "It's almost extortion," said a Konover vice president of Tedford's complaints.
    Although we have never heard of any developer advertising anything but livable square feet, no party to the dispute has yet to claim the law is on one side or the other (sounds like blind justice).  The best the local building inspector could say is that he had never heard of anyone using the Konover method of measurement.
    "You are buying living space," he said, "not insulation."
    Konover may not lose any legal battle - Tedford has gotten his deposit back for the unit - but the bad PR could not come at a worse time for the firm.  Today, voters in the nearby town of Simsbury are going to the polls to consider whether to enfranchise a newly invented party whose candidates pledge more rational development of the town's remaining space.  The race is predicted to be close. 

    Specifically at issue is whether current town officials have been too lax (and, perhaps, colluding) with a developer who wants to build a "big box" Target department store on a verdant piece of property just across the street from a residential development.  The possibility of increased traffic, reduced property values, and the loss of small-town charm has enflamed local opinion. If the new party wins, it is almost a sure thing the developer will lose.
    The developer, you may have guessed, is Konover.  And its fortunes could turn on a lousy 100 square feet.  

    I have stopped being jealous of folks with beachfront property I can't afford.  I am starting to feel sorry for them.  
    We reported here that the 18th green at Wild Dunes' Ocean Course, which we played just this last August, is gone, washed away by the tides, and that the homes adjacent to the 18th fairway and green may be next.  This is not an isolated incident.  Up and down the east coast of the U.S., from Cape Cod to Florida, some homes are falling into the sea and many others are threatened.  Wild Dunes is a microcosm of the issues that face these oceanfront homeowners and their fellow taxpayers, and it should be a cautionary tale for those whose dreams of a future home on the oceanfront could turn into a nightmare.
    In a nutshell, the debate on what to do about the situation is the same in Martha's Vineyard as it is at Wild Dunes.  People faced with losing their homes believe that the beach is a public resource, and that their governments and fellow taxpayers should help bear the burden to save the pubic resource.  Those who don't use the beach or are simply content to let Neptune do his work are not willing to help out.  They claim, and with some justification, that those who built homes where protective dunes once stood knew they were courting disaster eventually.  It is now eventually.100_5243wilddunes18thfwysandbags.jpg
    The lines were drawn pretty sharply in a group of letters to the editor a week ago in the Charleston (SC) Post & Courier, the major local paper which had come out earlier in October for removal of the sand bags holding back the sea.  Earlier attempts had resulted in shredding of the bags, which were then carried out to sea and, in the Post & Courier's opinion, created "a hazard for marine life as well as an oceangoing litter problem for the state's entire coast."  The Wild Dunes owners believe the sand bags are the only way to hold back the sea in combination with sand they want trucked in from farther north, as well as sand from a spit just south of Wild Dunes (bringing in local sand isn't going to happen, according to local officials).  The situation is a mess, both literally and figuratively, and it is fraying nerves; and although those of us at a distance may feel sorry for those facing the loss of their homes, some of their fellow citizens are talking like it is Judgment Day.
    "...everyone has been forewarned about building too close to the shore," wrote one local citizen who argued for letting the homes fall into the sea. "Wild Dunes residents have chosen to ignore these warnings for decades,"
    "We need to stop writing new flood insurance policies on undeveloped land," wrote another. "If an owner wants to develop, then let him self-insure...Once a structure is destroyed, the flood insurance should pay and the land abandoned, never to be developed again."
    A Wild Dunes owner, fearful of what will happen to the resort's private oceanfront club and the entire island's economy, wrote, "Unfortunately and inexplicably, it seems that some local critics would be happy to have our buildings and golf course fall into the ocean. For those of us who live and golf along the ocean, and for our supporters in the Charleston area, that attitude is a shortsighted view relative to the long-term viability of the Isle of Palms."
    We won't predict the outcome on Isle of Palms, but those Blue Ridge Mountains in the Carolinas are looking more attractive than ever.