| Green in the gills: Developers have to play catch up with environmentally conscious customers |
| Saturday, 23 February 2008 | |
|
Some "preferred" builders are actually mandatory to use." Then the couple ran up against a brick wall, in a manner of speaking (most of the homes in Analog are brick). The developer provided them with the list of its preferred builders, just a half dozen, one of the shorter lists I've encountered. Other communities maintain lists of up to 20 or more, if they have any such list at all. To make matters worse for Jay and Kate, Analog's "preferred" actually means mandatory. You must choose from among the limited number of builders on Analog's list. Developers will tell you that they rely on a preferred list to ensure control of the building designs and exterior materials, to keep the architectural style of homes pure and indigenous. That is a bit misleading since virtually all communities maintain architectural review boards (ARBs) for such purposes. These boards comprise homeowners as well as the developer's representatives. The more likely explanation is that developers can control the contractors' pricing by restricting choice; the builders are virtually guaranteed work throughout the "If developers don't start building green, they will be out of business in five years." -- Adam Ney The couple interviewed the six preferred builders at Analog. They were surprised to learn that none of them had ever built even a partially green home. A few said they would be happy to build the home but they would have to charge Jay and Kate a premium to call in more experienced green sub-contractors. As you can imagine, the couple wasn't thrilled to learn their builders would be learning on the job and being paid extra by Jay and Kate for the training. Adam Ney thinks such contractors are way behind the times. Adam is co-founder of AuctoVerno, LLC, a green-building marketing services firm in Connecticut and promoter of sustainable construction. "Residential green construction is gaining momentum," Adam says. "[Developers] think the cost is way too high, but it is not so and there is a ton of low hanging fruit...like eco-friendly paints, [which] are the same price as traditional paints. And while most developers think that going green will cost anywhere from 15-20% more than the traditional spec, the World Business Council on Sustainable Development released a report recently that says the upfront costs are really 5%." Adam adds that the payback for an owner of a green house is 16 to 24 months, and that Moore's Law -- every 18 months technology costs are cut in half -- points the way to much more affordable green materials in the next few years. Jay and Kate's initial pleas to the developer to bring in the couple's own green-savvy builder have been rejected. Although they have contemplated legal action, they know that even if they win the battle, they could face obstacles ahead from the developer and, potentially, their neighbors who might thumb their noses at the prospect of solar panels and other architectural details at odds with current community standards. That would be no way to start a life in a new place. A little patience may be on their side as developers catch up with more and more of their customers. Indeed, a few golf course communities, like The Cliffs in the Carolinas, have extended their efforts beyond the Audobon friendly practices on their golf courses to green construction of their homes. Adam Ney thinks more and more communities will join them. "If developers don't start building green," says Adam, "they will be out of business in five years because every development around them will be green." If you are interested in learning more about green building, visit the AuctorVerno web site at BuildingCTGreen.com. Comments (0)
 Write comment: Registered users please log in.
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
